FitCalc Brunei
Fitness

Heart Rate Zone Calculator

Training zones for cardio workouts.

Estimated max heart rate: 187 bpm

1

Warm up

94112 bpm

2

Fat burn

112131 bpm

3

Aerobic

131150 bpm

4

Anaerobic

150168 bpm

5

Max effort

168187 bpm

Training with purpose: understanding heart rate zones

Heart rate zones divide your training intensity into bands, each associated with different physiological adaptations. Training entirely at one intensity — typically moderate, "comfortable" effort — is one of the most common reasons people plateau despite consistent training; deliberately varying intensity across zones tends to produce better results for most goals.

This calculator estimates your maximum heart rate using the Tanaka formula (208 − 0.7 × age), published in 2001 from a large meta-analysis and generally found to be more accurate across age groups than the older "220 minus age" rule of thumb still seen on many gym cardio machines.

What each zone does

Zone 1 (50-60% of max) is light, conversational-pace effort, used for warm-ups, recovery, and active rest days. Zone 2 (60-70%) is the classic "fat-burning" zone — sustainable for long durations and a major contributor to aerobic base fitness. Zone 3 (70-80%) is moderately hard, improving cardiovascular efficiency, while zone 4 (80-90%) is genuinely challenging, anaerobic-threshold-style effort that builds speed and lactate tolerance. Zone 5 (90-100%) is maximal effort, sustainable only briefly, used for sprint and high-intensity interval work.

A practical training split

Many evidence-informed training plans for general fitness or endurance allocate roughly 70-80% of weekly training time to zones 1-2, with the remainder split between zone 3 and the harder zone 4-5 work — often called a "polarized" approach. This avoids the common trap of doing too much moderate-intensity (zone 3) training, which can be fatiguing without delivering the strongest aerobic or high-intensity adaptations of either extreme.

Frequently asked questions

Why use the Tanaka formula instead of '220 minus age'?

The classic '220 minus age' formula was never based on a rigorous study and tends to be less accurate, especially for older adults. The Tanaka formula (208 − 0.7 × age), published in 2001 from a meta-analysis of over 18,000 people, is more consistently accurate across age groups.

Which zone should I train in?

It depends on your goal. Zones 1-2 build aerobic base and aid recovery, zone 3 improves general cardiovascular fitness, and zones 4-5 build high-intensity capacity and speed. Most well-rounded training plans spend the majority of time in zones 1-3.

Is this as accurate as a lab test?

No formula based on age alone is as accurate as a measured max heart rate from a graded exercise test, but it's a solid practical estimate for everyday training purposes.